How to File a Railroad Lawsuit
Chemical solvents are part of the daily work environment for many railroad workers. If you contracted leukemia while working for the railroad and suspect that your exposure to the workplace caused, you may be entitled to compensation.
Unlike workers' comp claims, FELA suits allow plaintiffs to receive a wide range of damages. Find out more about FELA claims and how to file a claim.
Benzene Exposure Lawsuits
Benzene is a petroleum-based compound can be found in gasoline and diesel fuel. It is clear or light yellow that vaporizes when exposed to air. It is used in the manufacturing of chemicals, rubber and paints. It is also employed to clean machines and remove grease. As part of their work, railroad workers handle or utilize toxic chemicals.
Workers exposed to benzene during work can develop leukemia and cancers. These symptoms include fatigue, loss of appetite, nausea, vomiting hair loss, and an overall feeling of being unwell. Some workers may also experience difficulties with concentration and memory loss.
If a person is diagnosed with one of these diseases the worker can sue his or her employer under the Federal Employers Liability Act. To be able to recover damages, a person must prove that their employment or exposure to a chemical were a significant contributor to the illness.

Workers who have been exposed to benzene could also make wrongful death claims against their employers. Wrongful death damages can cover funeral and burial costs and future wages lost as well as emotional distress, and suffering. The damages are usually calculated using the same methods as workers who are awarded FELA compensation.
FELA Lawsuits
Railroad companies are notorious for exposure of workers to carcinogens, such asbestos, diesel exhaust and lead. This puts many former workers on rails at a higher risk for developing serious occupational ailments like mesothelioma, lung cancer and kidney cancer. Leukemia lawsuit have the option of suing for compensation for their injuries. The Federal Employers Liability (FELA) Act allows these workers to sue employers in a legal framework that is different from traditional workers' compensation programs.
In contrast to the workers' compensation laws, FELA requires employees to prove that negligence by their employer contributed to their illness or injury. If an employee can demonstrate that the negligence of a railroad company contributed to their injury or illness and they are entitled to damages. This includes claims to pay back lost wages, medical expenses as well as discomfort and pain.
Railroad corporations typically employ aggressive and sophisticated legal strategies to fight these claims. They may use arguments that the former worker is unable to identify an individual instance of unhealthful exposure to toxic substances, and can't name a manufacturer of equipment or components that contain harmful chemicals or toxins. A FELA attorney who has experience in railroad injury claims can contest these defenses. union pacific railroad lawsuit can also find evidence of the railroad's negligence from a variety of sources, including third-parties.
Class Action Lawsuits
A class action lawsuit permits one plaintiff to sue for others who have suffered similar injuries. The Plaintiff also referred to as"class representative "class representative," sues a company (in this instance, BNSF Railway Company). People who have similar claims are collectively referred to as the "class." In group actions, one court resolves all of the issues for the entire class. This is more efficient than having a number of individual lawsuits.
If you are a member of the Class, you may be entitled to compensation for your medical expenses loss of earnings, pain and suffering, loss of enjoyment of life, and other damages. You could also be entitled to wrongful death damages if a loved one died of railroad-related leukemia.
Railroad companies are required to provide workers with a safe work environment. Unfortunately the majority of railroads fail comply with this requirement and employees are exposed to toxic industrial solvents and diesel exhaust while at their job. This could lead to the development of cancer as well as other health issues.
This Court has certified this Class and is moving it toward trial. The Court hasn't decided if BNSF violated BIPA, or how much money you may be able receive or any other benefits. If and when the Court does decide the matter, you will be informed regarding the process to get any benefits or money. You can determine whether you are eligible for a claim by reading the documents available on this site. This includes the Court's order to certify the class, the Second Amended Complaint submitted by the Plaintiff and BNSF's reply to the second Amended Complaint.
Lawsuits involving Wrongful Death
In the event that someone has died due to a third party's negligence, the victim's family can file a wrongful-death lawsuit. This type of lawsuit seeks compensation for the loss of the deceased's earnings, loss of companionship and emotional pain and suffering. The family members who survive are compensated for the loss and costs they'll incur in the future. A wrongful death lawsuit can be brought by the who died's spouse, siblings, children parents, nieces, nephews or anyone else who was financially dependent on them at the time of the accident.
A wrongful death suit can be filed in the case of a fatal train collision to hold the railroad company accountable for the death of a loved ones. A train accident lawyer can assist a family member of a victim get the highest settlement amount.
For Bladder cancer lawsuit in a wrongful death lawsuit involving the aftermath of a train crash the attorney will review the details of the case, including accident reports as well as physical evidence. Attorneys can also make use of expert witness testimony, in addition to other sources to present the strongest possible case.
In union pacific railroad lawsuit -death action, a widow suing BNSF over the death of her husband at a railroad crossing in Pontotoc County. The widow claimed that BNSF did not provide adequate warnings. She argued the crossing did not have automatic gates and that the lights flashing did not provide adequate warnings of approaching trains. BNSF filed pretrial motions arguing that federal law preempted widow's claims. The court denied BNSF’s motions.